Is AINFT a scam?
LOW RISK · 26/100AINFT (NFT) has an automated risk score of 26/100 — low risk. AINFT is down 97% from its all-time high and is trading with very little liquidity relative to its size. That combination is common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but it also describes assets in a prolonged bear market — it is not evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone.
Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026
AINFT
nftLOW RISK$2.36e-7
+0.96% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
LOW RISK
Driven primarily by drawdown from all-time high (25 of 25 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about AINFT, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 97% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure.
- Volume Anomaly: Volume at 4.0% of market cap — within normal range.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
Price is far below its all-time high while trading with very little liquidity — a pattern common to collapsed and dormant tokens, and also to assets in a long bear market
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
25/25
100%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
1/20
5%
Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps
Not contributing (5): Market Cap Risk, Supply Structure, Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-09-13
AINFT’s deployed contract grants its owner 1 privilege that can affect your position. These are properties of the code itself, not allegations about anyone’s conduct — many legitimate projects retain them deliberately.
Owner can mint new tokens
Supply is not fixed; new tokens can be created, diluting existing holders.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
Ten largest wallets
36.1%
including custodial
Largest private wallets
23.0%
after excluding 1
1 of AINFT’s ten largest holders is a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn address — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating it out moves the top-10 figure by 13.1 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.
Wallets excluded from the top 10
| Address | Classified as | Label | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x0000…dead | Burn address | Burn Addresses · Burn Address: 0x00...dEaD | 14.06% |
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 98 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
AINFT holder-concentration history
10 daily measurements · +0.7 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of AINFT’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 10 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 23% on 30 Aug 2026; the most recent reading is 23% on 31 Aug 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (10)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 23% | No | |
| 23% | No | |
| 22.7% | No | |
| 22.6% | No | |
| 22.5% | No | |
| 22.3% | No | |
| 22.4% | No | |
| 22.5% | No | |
| 22.4% | No | |
| 22.3% | No |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track AINFT and 1,200+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about AINFT
Is AINFT a scam?
We do not allege that AINFT (NFT) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 23% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 26/100 on our automated scale, which we label low risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is AINFT flagged as low risk?
AINFT's risk score is driven mainly by: drawdown from all-time high — Down 97% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure; volume anomaly — Volume at 4.0% of market cap — within normal range.
Who controls AINFT's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of AINFT hold 23.0% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our 50% manipulation-flag threshold.
Is AINFT safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. AINFT scores 26/100 (low risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.