Is claus a scam?
MEDIUM RISK · 31/100claus (CLAUS) has an automated risk score of 31/100 — medium risk. No single factor dominates claus's assessment — the score reflects several converging measurements. 130.8% swing in 24h — an extreme one-day move. Market cap under $10M — small enough that one large holder's trades can move the price.
Automated assessment · updated 12 October 2026
claus
clausMEDIUM$0.008883
+130.75% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
MEDIUM RISK
Driven primarily by price volatility (15 of 15 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-10-12 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about claus, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Price Volatility: 130.8% swing in 24h — an extreme one-day move.
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $10M — small enough that one large holder's trades can move the price.
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 59% from its all-time high — a significant decline.
- Volume Anomaly: Volume at 38.0% of market cap — within normal range.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
Several risk factors score at once
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
8/25
32%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
1/20
5%
24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
7/15
47%
Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.
Price Volatility
Price Action
15/15
100%
24-hour price change. Large one-day moves happen for many reasons, including news and thin liquidity; this measures the size of the move, not its cause.
Not contributing (3): Supply Structure, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-10-13
Our contract source did not report on any of the 7 owner privileges we check for. What it did return for claus is below — treat the unreported checks as unknown, not as absent.
Contract is upgradeable (proxy)
The logic behind this token can be replaced after deployment. This is a standard pattern used by many established protocols; it means a review of today’s code does not bind tomorrow’s.
Not answered by our source: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct. Treat these as unknown, not as absent.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
Ten largest wallets
17.9%
including custodial
Largest private wallets
15.2%
after excluding 1
1 of claus’s ten largest holders is a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn address — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating it out moves the top-10 figure by 2.7 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.
Wallets excluded from the top 10
| Address | Classified as | Label | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x0000…8a90 | Liquidity pool | Uniswap · Uniswap V4: Pool Manager · Liquidity Pool · DEX · Uniswap V4 | 3.77% |
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 99 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-12. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
claus holder-concentration history
1 dated measurement · +0 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of claus’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 1 day since 12 Oct 2026. The highest reading was 15.2% on 12 Oct 2026; the most recent reading is 15.2% on 12 Oct 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (1)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 15.2% | No |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track claus and 1,700+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about claus
Is claus a scam?
We do not allege that claus (CLAUS) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 15.2% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 31/100 on our automated scale, which we label medium risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is claus flagged as medium risk?
claus's risk score is driven mainly by: price volatility — 130.8% swing in 24h — an extreme one-day move; market cap risk — Market cap under $10M — small enough that one large holder's trades can move the price; drawdown from all-time high — Down 59% from its all-time high — a significant decline.
Who controls claus's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of claus hold 15.2% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our flag threshold.
Is claus safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. claus scores 31/100 (medium risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.