Is DMT-NAT a scam?
LOW RISK · 25/100DMT-NAT (NAT) has an automated risk score of 25/100 — low risk. DMT-NAT shows very low trading activity and is 80% below its all-time high. Our measurements cover market data only — we do not assess development activity, and low volume alone does not establish that a project has been discontinued.
Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026
DMT-NAT
natLOW RISK$7.96e-8
-0.90% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
LOW RISK
Driven primarily by drawdown from all-time high (14 of 25 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about DMT-NAT, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 80% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline.
- Volume Anomaly: Very low volume (1.33% of MCap) — limited liquidity trap risk.
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
Very low trading activity relative to size. We measure market data only and do not assess development activity
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
14/25
56%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
8/20
40%
Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
3/15
20%
Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)
Not contributing (4): Supply Structure, Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-09-10
Our contract source did not report on any of the 7 owner privileges we check for. What it did return for DMT-NAT is below — treat the unreported checks as unknown, not as absent.
Contract is upgradeable (proxy)
The logic behind this token can be replaced after deployment. This is a standard pattern used by many established protocols; it means a review of today’s code does not bind tomorrow’s.
Not answered by our source: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct. Treat these as unknown, not as absent.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
Ten largest wallets
23.5%
including custodial
Largest private wallets
7.1%
after excluding 2
2 of DMT-NAT’s ten largest holders are labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn addresses — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating them out moves the top-10 figure by 16.4 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.
Wallets excluded from the top 10
| Address | Classified as | Label | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x3ee1…a585 | Bridge contract | Wormhole · Wormhole: Token Bridge | 11.02% |
| 0x0000…8a90 | Liquidity pool | Uniswap · Uniswap v4 | 6.34% |
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 98 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
DMT-NAT holder-concentration history
1 daily measurement · +0 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of DMT-NAT’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 1 day since 31 Aug 2026. The highest reading was 7.1% on 31 Aug 2026; the most recent reading is 7.1% on 31 Aug 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (1)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1% | No |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track DMT-NAT and 1,200+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about DMT-NAT
Is DMT-NAT a scam?
We do not allege that DMT-NAT (NAT) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 7.1% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 25/100 on our automated scale, which we label low risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is DMT-NAT flagged as low risk?
DMT-NAT's risk score is driven mainly by: drawdown from all-time high — Down 80% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline; volume anomaly — Very low volume (1.33% of MCap) — limited liquidity trap risk; market cap risk — Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.
Who controls DMT-NAT's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of DMT-NAT hold 7.1% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our 50% manipulation-flag threshold.
Is DMT-NAT safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. DMT-NAT scores 25/100 (low risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.