Is Ferrum Network a scam?
HIGH RISK · 58/100Ferrum Network (FRM) has an automated risk score of 58/100 — high risk. Ferrum Network is down 93% from its all-time high and is trading with very little liquidity relative to its size. That combination is common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but it also describes assets in a prolonged bear market — it is not evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone.
Automated assessment · updated 11 October 2026
Ferrum Network
frmHIGH RISK$0.0685
0.00% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
HIGH RISK
Driven primarily by supply structure (20 of 20 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-10-11 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about Ferrum Network, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Supply Structure: Only 0.0% of supply is circulating — an estimated ~100% is not yet circulating, so future releases could dilute holders substantially.
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 93% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater.
- Volume Anomaly: Near-zero volume (0.00% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price.
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
Price is far below its all-time high while trading with very little liquidity — a pattern common to collapsed and dormant tokens, and also to assets in a long bear market
Very low trading activity relative to size. We measure market data only and do not assess development activity
Most of the total supply is not yet circulating; future releases would dilute holders if demand does not grow with them
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
20/25
80%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
15/20
75%
24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
3/15
20%
Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.
Supply Structure
Tokenomics
20/20
100%
Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means much of the supply has yet to reach the market, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders. Estimated from reported supply; holder data read from the chain is scored separately.
Not contributing (3): Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-10-12
We checked Ferrum Network’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
Ten largest wallets
60.3%
including custodial
Largest private wallets
56.8%
after excluding 1
1 of Ferrum Network’s ten largest holders is a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn address — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating it out moves the top-10 figure by 3.5 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.
Wallets excluded from the top 10
| Address | Classified as | Label | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x05a3…4d0c | Liquidity pool | StandardPoolConverter | 4.44% |
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 94 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-11. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
Ferrum Network holder-concentration history
1 dated measurement · +0 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Ferrum Network’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 1 day since 11 Oct 2026. The highest reading was 56.8% on 11 Oct 2026; the most recent reading is 56.8% on 11 Oct 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (1)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 56.8% | No |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track Ferrum Network and 1,700+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Ferrum Network
Is Ferrum Network a scam?
We do not allege that Ferrum Network (FRM) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 56.8% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 58/100 on our automated scale, which we label high risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Ferrum Network flagged as high risk?
Ferrum Network's risk score is driven mainly by: supply structure — Only 0.0% of supply is circulating — an estimated ~100% is not yet circulating, so future releases could dilute holders substantially; drawdown from all-time high — Down 93% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater; volume anomaly — Near-zero volume (0.00% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price.
Who controls Ferrum Network's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Ferrum Network hold 56.8% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our flag threshold.
Is Ferrum Network safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Ferrum Network scores 58/100 (high risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.