Is Litentry a scam?
HIGH RISK · 54/100Litentry (LIT) has an automated risk score of 54/100 — high risk. Litentry is down 99% from its all-time high and is trading with very little liquidity relative to its size. That combination is common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but it also describes assets in a prolonged bear market — it is not evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone.
Automated assessment · updated 21 October 2026
Litentry
litHIGH RISK$0.1159
0.00% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
HIGH RISK
Driven primarily by drawdown from all-time high (25 of 25 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-10-21 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about Litentry, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure.
- Volume Anomaly: Near-zero volume (0.34% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price.
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $10M — small enough that one large holder's trades can move the price.
- Supply Structure: Over half the supply (~55%) is held off-market — more supply is waiting off-market than is trading.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
Price is far below its all-time high while trading with very little liquidity — a pattern common to collapsed and dormant tokens, and also to assets in a long bear market
Very low trading activity relative to size. We measure market data only and do not assess development activity
A small share of total supply is circulating (estimated from reported supply figures, not from holder data). The price is set by that small share
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
25/25
100%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
15/20
75%
24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
7/15
47%
Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.
Supply Structure
Tokenomics
7/20
35%
Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means much of the supply has yet to reach the market, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders. Estimated from reported supply; holder data read from the chain is scored separately.
Not contributing (3): Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-10-21
We checked Litentry’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
Ten largest wallets
98.6%
including custodial
Largest private wallets
7.4%
after excluding 2
2 of Litentry’s ten largest holders are labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn addresses — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating them out moves the top-10 figure by 91.2 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.
Most of Litentry’s supply therefore sits in the excluded addresses. Burned supply is permanently gone, but treasury, vesting and foundation holdings are excluded too, and those can still reach the market when they unlock — a low private-wallet figure is not the same as a low future sell-side risk.
Wallets excluded from the top 10
| Address | Classified as | Label | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x0000…dead | Burn address | Null: 0x00...dEaD · Null: 0x00...dEaD · Burn · Null | 91.21% |
| 0xd7da…cd54 | Exchange wallet | Binance · Binance: Deposit Address · DEPOSIT ADDRESS · Binance Dep | 0.07% |
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 86 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-21. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
Track Litentry and 1,700+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Litentry
Is Litentry a scam?
We do not allege that Litentry (LIT) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 7.4% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 54/100 on our automated scale, which we label high risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Litentry flagged as high risk?
Litentry's risk score is driven mainly by: drawdown from all-time high — Down 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure; volume anomaly — Near-zero volume (0.34% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price; market cap risk — Market cap under $10M — small enough that one large holder's trades can move the price.
Who controls Litentry's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Litentry hold 7.4% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our flag threshold.
Is Litentry safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Litentry scores 54/100 (high risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.