FraudCoins.com

Is Peapods Finance a scam?

MEDIUM RISK · 32/100

Peapods Finance (PEAS) has an automated risk score of 32/100 — medium risk. Peapods Finance shows very low trading activity and is 82% below its all-time high. Our measurements cover market data only — we do not assess development activity, and low volume alone does not establish that a project has been discontinued.

Automated assessment · updated 11 October 2026

Peapods Finance

Peapods Finance

peasMEDIUM
Inactive Market

$2.060

+2.35% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

32/100

Risk Score

MEDIUM RISK

Driven primarily by volume anomaly (15 of 20 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-10-11 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about Peapods Finance, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • Volume Anomaly: Near-zero volume (0.10% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price.
  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 82% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Inactive Market

Very low trading activity relative to size. We measure market data only and do not assess development activity

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

14/25

56%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 82% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

15/20

75%

24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.

Finding: Near-zero volume (0.10% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.

Finding: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price

Not contributing (4): Supply Structure, Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$20.48M
24h Volume$20.57K
Vol / MCap0.1%
All-Time High$11.74
ATH Drop-82.45%
ATH Date2 years ago
Circulating Supply9.94M
Total Supply9.94M
Max Supply9.94M
7d Change—
30d Change—

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Ethereum · measured 2026-10-12

We checked Peapods Finance’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.

Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

Ten largest wallets

43.2%

including custodial

Largest private wallets

33.9%

after excluding 2

2 of Peapods Finance’s ten largest holders are labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn addresses — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating them out moves the top-10 figure by 9.3 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.

Wallets excluded from the top 10

AddressClassified asLabelShare
0x8016…b433Bridge contractMyOFTAdapter8.73%
0xae75…9160Liquidity poolUniswapV3Pool3.82%

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 97 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-11. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

Peapods Finance holder-concentration history

1 dated measurement · +0 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Peapods Finance’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 1 day since 11 Oct 2026. The highest reading was 33.9% on 11 Oct 2026; the most recent reading is 33.9% on 11 Oct 2026.

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-10-112026-10-18
Recorded measurements (1)
Dated top-10 holder concentration readings for Peapods Finance
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
33.9%No

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track Peapods Finance and 1,700+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about Peapods Finance

Is Peapods Finance a scam?

We do not allege that Peapods Finance (PEAS) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 33.9% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 32/100 on our automated scale, which we label medium risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is Peapods Finance flagged as medium risk?

Peapods Finance's risk score is driven mainly by: volume anomaly — Near-zero volume (0.10% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price; drawdown from all-time high — Down 82% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline; market cap risk — Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.

Who controls Peapods Finance's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Peapods Finance hold 33.9% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our flag threshold.

Is Peapods Finance safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Peapods Finance scores 32/100 (medium risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks