FraudCoins.com

Is Request a scam?

LOW RISK · 29/100

Request (REQ) has an automated risk score of 29/100 — low risk. Request is down 95% from its all-time high and is trading with very little liquidity relative to its size. That combination is common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but it also describes assets in a prolonged bear market — it is not evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone. Down 95% from ATH — catastrophic collapse indicating likely exit scam. Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.

Automated assessment · updated 1 August 2026

Request

Request

reqLOW RISK
Deep Drawdown, Thin Liquidity

$0.0507

-0.80% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

29/ 100

Risk Score

LOW RISK

Request is down 95% from its all-time high and is trading with very little liquidity relative to its size. That combination is common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but it also describes assets in a prolonged bear market — it is not evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone. Down 95% from ATH — catastrophic collapse indicating likely exit scam. Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.

Here is what the public data shows about Request, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • Price Collapse: Down 95% from ATH — catastrophic collapse indicating likely exit scam.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.
  • Volume Anomaly: Volume at 2.7% of market cap — within normal range.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Deep Drawdown, Thin Liquidity

Price is far below its all-time high while trading with very little liquidity — a pattern common to collapsed and dormant tokens, and also to assets in a long bear market

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Price Collapse

Price Action

25/25

100%

Severe ATH drawdown signals exit scams, abandoned projects, or post-pump dumps

Finding: Down 95% from ATH — catastrophic collapse indicating likely exit scam

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

1/20

5%

Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps

Finding: Volume at 2.7% of market cap — within normal range

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)

Finding: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk

Supply Structure

Tokenomics

0/20

0%

Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).

Finding: ~100% free float — supply is reasonably distributed

Price Volatility

Price Action

0/15

0%

Extreme short-term price swings are a hallmark of coordinated pump-and-dump schemes

Finding: 0.8% swing in 24h — relatively stable

On-Chain Holder Concentration

Tokenomics

0/22

0%

Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Over 50% in the top 10 enables single-hand price control.

Finding: On-chain: the top 10 holders hold 39.7% of supply. Shown for transparency — not flagged as manipulation (below the 50% threshold, or an established protocol whose supply sits in DAO/foundation/vesting contracts)

Transparency Gaps

Transparency

0/10

0%

Legitimate projects have verifiable public websites, whitepapers, and open-source code

Finding: Basic transparency checks passed

Key Metrics

Market Cap$50.70M
24h Volume$1.39M
Vol / MCap2.7%
All-Time High$1.059
ATH Drop-95.21%
ATH Date8 years ago
Circulating Supply999.42M
Total Supply999.42M
Max Supply1.00B
7d Change
30d Change

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

Request holder-concentration history

10 daily measurements · +0 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Request’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 10 days since 23 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 39.7% on 29 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 39.7% on 1 Aug 2026.

10050050% flag threshold2026-07-232026-08-01

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-292026-08-01
Recorded measurements (10)
Daily top-10 holder concentration readings for Request
Date measuredTop 10 holdAbove 50% threshold
39.7%No
39.7%No
39.7%No
39.7%No
39.7%No
39.7%No
39.7%No
39.7%No
39.7%No
39.7%No

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track Request and 1,200+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about Request

Is Request a scam?

Request (REQ) carries an automated risk score of 29/100, rated low risk by FraudCoins.com. Request is down 95% from its all-time high and is trading with very little liquidity relative to its size. That combination is common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but it also describes assets in a prolonged bear market — it is not evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone. Down 95% from ATH — catastrophic collapse indicating likely exit scam. Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is Request flagged as low risk?

Request's risk score is driven mainly by: price collapse — Down 95% from ATH — catastrophic collapse indicating likely exit scam; market cap risk — Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk; volume anomaly — Volume at 2.7% of market cap — within normal range.

Who controls Request's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Request hold 39.7% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our 50% manipulation-flag threshold.

Is Request safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Request scores 29/100 (low risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks