Is Unibase a scam?
EXTREME RISK · 80/100Unibase (UB) has an automated risk score of 80/100 — extreme risk. Unibase is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 99.9% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk. Down 48% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026
Unibase
ubEXTREME$0.1275
-3.00% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
EXTREME RISK
Driven primarily by on-chain holder concentration (22 of 22 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about Unibase, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 99.9% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control.
- Supply Structure: 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk.
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 48% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
- Volume Anomaly: Volume at 3.4% of market cap — within normal range.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
A small number of insider/team wallets control most of the supply (very low free float). This allows single-hand price control — pinning the price high to drain leveraged short positions via funding, then dumping the entire position for a sudden 90%+ collapse
Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. This is direct evidence that a handful of wallets can dictate the price and dump it at will
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
2/25
8%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
1/20
5%
Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps
Supply Structure
Tokenomics
11/20
55%
Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).
On-Chain Holder Concentration
Tokenomics
22/22
100%
Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Over 50% in the top 10 enables single-hand price control.
Not contributing (3): Market Cap Risk, Price Volatility, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-09-13
We checked Unibase’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
None of Unibase’s ten largest holders matched a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn address, so the 99.9% we report is simply the plain top-10 share. On many tokens a large share of supply sits in custodial or burn addresses and has to be separated out first; on this one it does not.
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 96 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
Unibase holder-concentration history
4 daily measurements · +0 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Unibase’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 4 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 99.9% on 18 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 99.9% on 31 Aug 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (4)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 99.9% | Yes | |
| 99.9% | Yes | |
| 99.9% | Yes | |
| 99.9% | Yes |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track Unibase and 1,200+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Unibase
Is Unibase a scam?
We do not allege that Unibase (UB) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 99.9% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 80/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Unibase flagged as extreme risk?
Unibase's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 99.9% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control; supply structure — 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk; drawdown from all-time high — Down 48% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
Who controls Unibase's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Unibase control 99.9% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level, a small number of wallets can move the price at will and sell their position at once.
Is Unibase safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Unibase scores 80/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.