FraudCoins.com

Is Veranta a scam?

EXTREME RISK · 73/100

Veranta (AVNT) has an automated risk score of 73/100 — extreme risk. Veranta is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 86.8% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. Down 96% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure. Over half the supply (~65%) is held off-market — a single coordinated seller can dictate the price.

Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026

Veranta

Veranta

avntEXTREME
Supply ConcentrationTop-10 Concentration

$0.0945

-5.50% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

73/100

Risk Score

EXTREME RISK

Driven primarily by drawdown from all-time high (25 of 25 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about Veranta, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 96% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure.
  • On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 86.8% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control.
  • Supply Structure: Over half the supply (~65%) is held off-market — a single coordinated seller can dictate the price.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Supply Concentration

A small number of insider/team wallets control most of the supply (very low free float). This allows single-hand price control — pinning the price high to drain leveraged short positions via funding, then dumping the entire position for a sudden 90%+ collapse

Top-10 Concentration

Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. This is direct evidence that a handful of wallets can dictate the price and dump it at will

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

25/25

100%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 96% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

1/20

5%

Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps

Finding: Volume at 13.2% of market cap — within normal range

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)

Finding: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk

Supply Structure

Tokenomics

7/20

35%

Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).

Finding: Over half the supply (~65%) is held off-market — a single coordinated seller can dictate the price

Price Volatility

Price Action

2/15

13%

Extreme short-term price swings are a hallmark of coordinated pump-and-dump schemes

Finding: 5.5% swing in 24h — moderate volatility

On-Chain Holder Concentration

Tokenomics

22/22

100%

Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Over 50% in the top 10 enables single-hand price control.

Finding: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 86.8% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control

Not contributing (1): Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$33.38M
24h Volume$4.40M
Vol / MCap13.2%
All-Time High$2.640
ATH Drop-96.42%
ATH Date11 months ago
Circulating Supply353.23M
Total Supply1.00B
Max Supply1.00B
7d Change
30d Change

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Base · measured 2026-09-10

Veranta’s deployed contract grants its owner 3 privileges that can affect your position. These are properties of the code itself, not allegations about anyone’s conduct — many legitimate projects retain them deliberately.

  • Owner can change any wallet balance

    A privileged address can alter balances directly, including reducing yours.

  • Owner can blacklist wallets

    Specific addresses can be barred from transferring the token.

  • Owner can mint new tokens

    Supply is not fixed; new tokens can be created, diluting existing holders.

Checked and not present: pause all transfers, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

1 of Veranta’s ten largest holders is a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn address, but its balance is small enough that removing it changes the top-10 share by under 0.1 points, leaving our figure of 86.8% effectively unchanged.

Wallets excluded from the top 10

AddressClassified asLabelShare
0xbaed…439fExchange walletBybit · Bybit: Hot Wallet1.06%

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 89 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

Veranta holder-concentration history

1 daily measurement · +0 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Veranta’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 1 day since 31 Aug 2026. The highest reading was 86.8% on 31 Aug 2026; the most recent reading is 86.8% on 31 Aug 2026.

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-292026-09-16
Recorded measurements (1)
Daily top-10 holder concentration readings for Veranta
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
86.8%Yes

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track Veranta and 1,200+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about Veranta

Is Veranta a scam?

We do not allege that Veranta (AVNT) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 86.8% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 73/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is Veranta flagged as extreme risk?

Veranta's risk score is driven mainly by: drawdown from all-time high — Down 96% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure; on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 86.8% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control; supply structure — Over half the supply (~65%) is held off-market — a single coordinated seller can dictate the price.

Who controls Veranta's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Veranta control 86.8% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level, a small number of wallets can move the price at will and sell their position at once.

Is Veranta safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Veranta scores 73/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks