FraudCoins.com

Is Band a scam?

EXTREME RISK · 70/100

Band (BAND) has an automated risk score of 70/100 — extreme risk. Band is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 79.4% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. Down 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure. Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.

Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026

Band

Band

bandEXTREME
Deep Drawdown, Thin LiquidityTop-10 Concentration

$0.1797

-5.17% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

70/100

Risk Score

EXTREME RISK

Driven primarily by drawdown from all-time high (25 of 25 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about Band, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure.
  • On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 79.4% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.
  • Price Volatility: 5.2% swing in 24h — moderate volatility.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Deep Drawdown, Thin Liquidity

Price is far below its all-time high while trading with very little liquidity — a pattern common to collapsed and dormant tokens, and also to assets in a long bear market

Top-10 Concentration

Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. This is direct evidence that a handful of wallets can dictate the price and dump it at will

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

25/25

100%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

1/20

5%

Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps

Finding: Volume at 4.1% of market cap — within normal range

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)

Finding: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk

Price Volatility

Price Action

2/15

13%

Extreme short-term price swings are a hallmark of coordinated pump-and-dump schemes

Finding: 5.2% swing in 24h — moderate volatility

On-Chain Holder Concentration

Tokenomics

22/22

100%

Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Over 50% in the top 10 enables single-hand price control.

Finding: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 79.4% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control

Not contributing (2): Supply Structure, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$32.73M
24h Volume$1.35M
Vol / MCap4.1%
All-Time High$22.83
ATH Drop-99.21%
ATH Date5 years ago
Circulating Supply182.25M
Total Supply182.29M
Max SupplyN/A
7d Change
30d Change

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Ethereum · measured 2026-09-10

Band’s deployed contract grants its owner 3 privileges that can affect your position. These are properties of the code itself, not allegations about anyone’s conduct — many legitimate projects retain them deliberately.

  • Owner can change any wallet balance

    A privileged address can alter balances directly, including reducing yours.

  • Owner can mint new tokens

    Supply is not fixed; new tokens can be created, diluting existing holders.

  • Contract has a hidden owner

    Privileged control exists at an address not exposed as the owner.

Checked and not present: pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract can self-destruct.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

Ten largest wallets

81.3%

including custodial

Largest private wallets

79.4%

after excluding 2

2 of Band’s ten largest holders are labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn addresses — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating them out moves the top-10 figure by 1.9 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.

Wallets excluded from the top 10

AddressClassified asLabelShare
0xa9d1…3e43Exchange walletCoinbase · Coinbase: Hot Wallet2.41%
0x28c6…1d60Exchange walletBinance · Binance: Hot Wallet1.78%

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 91 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

Band holder-concentration history

1 daily measurement · +0 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Band’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 1 day since 31 Aug 2026. The highest reading was 79.4% on 31 Aug 2026; the most recent reading is 79.4% on 31 Aug 2026.

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-302026-09-16
Recorded measurements (1)
Daily top-10 holder concentration readings for Band
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
79.4%Yes

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track Band and 1,200+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about Band

Is Band a scam?

We do not allege that Band (BAND) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 79.4% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 70/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is Band flagged as extreme risk?

Band's risk score is driven mainly by: drawdown from all-time high — Down 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure; on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 79.4% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control; market cap risk — Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.

Who controls Band's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Band control 79.4% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level, a small number of wallets can move the price at will and sell their position at once.

Is Band safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Band scores 70/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks