FraudCoins.com

Is Billions Network a scam?

EXTREME RISK · 77/100

Billions Network (BILL) has an automated risk score of 77/100 — extreme risk. Billions Network is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.7% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. Down 95% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater. 24.3% circulating (~76% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk.

Automated assessment · updated 24 August 2026

Billions Network

Billions Network

billEXTREME
Supply ConcentrationTop-10 Concentration

$0.0122

-4.54% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

77/100

Risk Score

EXTREME RISK

Driven primarily by on-chain holder concentration (22 of 22 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-08-24 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about Billions Network, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.7% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control.
  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 95% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater.
  • Supply Structure: 24.3% circulating (~76% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Supply Concentration

A small number of insider/team wallets control most of the supply (very low free float). This allows single-hand price control — pinning the price high to drain leveraged short positions via funding, then dumping the entire position for a sudden 90%+ collapse

Top-10 Concentration

Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. This is direct evidence that a handful of wallets can dictate the price and dump it at will

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

20/25

80%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 95% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

1/20

5%

Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps

Finding: Volume at 23.8% of market cap — within normal range

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)

Finding: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk

Supply Structure

Tokenomics

11/20

55%

Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).

Finding: 24.3% circulating (~76% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk

On-Chain Holder Concentration

Tokenomics

22/22

100%

Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Over 50% in the top 10 enables single-hand price control.

Finding: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.7% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control

Not contributing (2): Price Volatility, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$29.55M
24h Volume$7.02M
Vol / MCap23.8%
All-Time High$0.2335
ATH Drop-94.79%
ATH Date4 months ago
Circulating Supply2.43B
Total Supply10.00B
Max Supply10.00B
7d Change
30d Change

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Ethereum · measured 2026-09-15

Our contract source did not report on any of the 7 owner privileges we check for. What it did return for Billions Network is below — treat the unreported checks as unknown, not as absent.

  • Contract is upgradeable (proxy)

    The logic behind this token can be replaced after deployment. This is a standard pattern used by many established protocols; it means a review of today’s code does not bind tomorrow’s.

Not answered by our source: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct. Treat these as unknown, not as absent.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

Billions Network holder-concentration history

14 daily measurements · -0.9 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Billions Network’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 14 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 94.6% on 18 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 93.7% on 22 Aug 2026.

10050050% flag threshold2026-07-182026-08-22

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-292026-09-16
Recorded measurements (14)
Daily top-10 holder concentration readings for Billions Network
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
93.7%Yes
93.8%Yes
94.2%Yes
94.3%Yes
94.4%Yes
94.5%Yes
94.3%Yes
94.4%Yes
94.5%Yes
94.6%Yes
94.5%Yes
94.4%Yes

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track Billions Network and 1,200+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about Billions Network

Is Billions Network a scam?

We do not allege that Billions Network (BILL) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 93.7% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 77/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is Billions Network flagged as extreme risk?

Billions Network's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.7% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control; drawdown from all-time high — Down 95% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater; supply structure — 24.3% circulating (~76% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk.

Who controls Billions Network's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Billions Network control 93.7% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level, a small number of wallets can move the price at will and sell their position at once.

Is Billions Network safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Billions Network scores 77/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks