FraudCoins.com

Is Derive a scam?

LOW RISK · 8/100

Derive (DRV) has an automated risk score of 8/100 — low risk. No single factor dominates Derive's assessment — the score reflects several converging measurements. ~33% held off-market — moderate concentration/dilution risk. 7.6% swing in 24h — moderate volatility.

Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026

Derive

Derive

drvLOW RISK

$0.1524

+7.62% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

8/100

Risk Score

LOW RISK

Driven primarily by supply structure (3 of 20 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about Derive, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • Supply Structure: ~33% held off-market — moderate concentration/dilution risk.
  • Price Volatility: 7.6% swing in 24h — moderate volatility.
  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 33% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
  • Volume Anomaly: Volume at 3.5% of market cap — within normal range.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

2/25

8%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 33% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

1/20

5%

Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps

Finding: Volume at 3.5% of market cap — within normal range

Supply Structure

Tokenomics

3/20

15%

Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).

Finding: ~33% held off-market — moderate concentration/dilution risk

Price Volatility

Price Action

2/15

13%

Extreme short-term price swings are a hallmark of coordinated pump-and-dump schemes

Finding: 7.6% swing in 24h — moderate volatility

Not contributing (3): Market Cap Risk, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$152.15M
24h Volume$5.39M
Vol / MCap3.5%
All-Time High$0.2283
ATH Drop-33.23%
ATH Date1 year ago
Circulating Supply999.71M
Total Supply1.50B
Max Supply1.50B
7d Change
30d Change

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Ethereum · measured 2026-09-14

Our contract source did not report on any of the 7 owner privileges we check for. What it did return for Derive is below — treat the unreported checks as unknown, not as absent.

  • Contract is upgradeable (proxy)

    The logic behind this token can be replaced after deployment. This is a standard pattern used by many established protocols; it means a review of today’s code does not bind tomorrow’s.

Not answered by our source: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct. Treat these as unknown, not as absent.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

Ten largest wallets

82.0%

including custodial

Largest private wallets

81.7%

after excluding 1

1 of Derive’s ten largest holders is a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn address — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating it out moves the top-10 figure by 0.3 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.

Wallets excluded from the top 10

AddressClassified asLabelShare
0x0d07…92feExchange walletGate.io · Gate.io: Hot Wallet1.21%

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 96 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

Derive holder-concentration history

27 daily measurements · +0.3 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Derive’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 27 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 83.3% on 21 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 81.7% on 31 Aug 2026.

10050050% flag threshold2026-07-182026-08-31

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-302026-09-16
Recorded measurements (27)
Daily top-10 holder concentration readings for Derive
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
81.7%No
81.7%No
81.7%No
82.3%No
82.2%No
82.3%No
82.4%No
82.5%No
82.7%No
82.8%No
83%No
82.8%No

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track Derive and 1,200+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about Derive

Is Derive a scam?

We do not allege that Derive (DRV) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 81.7% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 8/100 on our automated scale, which we label low risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is Derive flagged as low risk?

Derive's risk score is driven mainly by: supply structure — ~33% held off-market — moderate concentration/dilution risk; price volatility — 7.6% swing in 24h — moderate volatility; drawdown from all-time high — Down 33% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.

Who controls Derive's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Derive hold 81.7% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our 50% manipulation-flag threshold.

Is Derive safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Derive scores 8/100 (low risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Other coins flagged for similar risks