Is Flying Tulip a scam?
LOW RISK · 16/100Flying Tulip (FT) has an automated risk score of 16/100 — low risk. No single factor dominates Flying Tulip's assessment — the score reflects several converging measurements. Very low volume (0.54% of MCap) — limited liquidity trap risk. Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.
Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026
Flying Tulip
ftLOW RISK$0.1015
+1.89% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
LOW RISK
Driven primarily by volume anomaly (8 of 20 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about Flying Tulip, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Volume Anomaly: Very low volume (0.54% of MCap) — limited liquidity trap risk.
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.
- Supply Structure: ~42% held off-market — moderate concentration/dilution risk.
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 9% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
2/25
8%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
8/20
40%
Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
3/15
20%
Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)
Supply Structure
Tokenomics
3/20
15%
Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).
Not contributing (3): Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-09-15
Flying Tulip’s deployed contract grants its owner 3 privileges that can affect your position. These are properties of the code itself, not allegations about anyone’s conduct — many legitimate projects retain them deliberately.
Owner can pause all transfers
Trading and transfers can be halted, locking holders in place.
Owner can mint new tokens
Supply is not fixed; new tokens can be created, diluting existing holders.
Contract has a hidden owner
Privileged control exists at an address not exposed as the owner.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, blacklist wallets, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
None of Flying Tulip’s ten largest holders matched a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn address, so the 11.9% we report is simply the plain top-10 share. On many tokens a large share of supply sits in custodial or burn addresses and has to be separated out first; on this one it does not.
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 99 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
Flying Tulip holder-concentration history
5 daily measurements · -88 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Flying Tulip’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 5 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 99.9% on 18 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 11.9% on 31 Aug 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (5)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 11.9% | No | |
| 11.9% | No | |
| 11.9% | No | |
| 11.9% | No | |
| 99.9% | Yes |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track Flying Tulip and 1,200+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Flying Tulip
Is Flying Tulip a scam?
We do not allege that Flying Tulip (FT) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 11.9% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 16/100 on our automated scale, which we label low risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Flying Tulip flagged as low risk?
Flying Tulip's risk score is driven mainly by: volume anomaly — Very low volume (0.54% of MCap) — limited liquidity trap risk; market cap risk — Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk; supply structure — ~42% held off-market — moderate concentration/dilution risk.
Who controls Flying Tulip's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Flying Tulip hold 11.9% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our 50% manipulation-flag threshold.
Is Flying Tulip safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Flying Tulip scores 16/100 (low risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.