FraudCoins.com

Is GEKKO a scam?

HIGH RISK · 63/100

GEKKO (GEKKO) has an automated risk score of 63/100 — high risk. GEKKO is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 63.1% of supply — majority control by a handful of addresses, a textbook manipulation setup. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. Down 94% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater. Near-zero volume (0.08% of MCap) — coin is effectively illiquid, exit is nearly impossible.

Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026

GEKKO

GEKKO

gekkoHIGH RISK
Deep Drawdown, Thin LiquidityInactive MarketSupply ConcentrationTop-10 Concentration

$8.18e-7

-1.75% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

63/100

Risk Score

HIGH RISK

Driven primarily by on-chain holder concentration (18 of 22 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about GEKKO, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 63.1% of supply — majority control by a handful of addresses, a textbook manipulation setup.
  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 94% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater.
  • Volume Anomaly: Near-zero volume (0.08% of MCap) — coin is effectively illiquid, exit is nearly impossible.
  • Supply Structure: Over half the supply (~70%) is held off-market — a single coordinated seller can dictate the price.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Deep Drawdown, Thin Liquidity

Price is far below its all-time high while trading with very little liquidity — a pattern common to collapsed and dormant tokens, and also to assets in a long bear market

Inactive Market

Very low trading activity relative to size. We measure market data only and do not assess development activity

Supply Concentration

A small number of insider/team wallets control most of the supply (very low free float). This allows single-hand price control — pinning the price high to drain leveraged short positions via funding, then dumping the entire position for a sudden 90%+ collapse

Top-10 Concentration

Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. This is direct evidence that a handful of wallets can dictate the price and dump it at will

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

20/25

80%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 94% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

15/20

75%

Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps

Finding: Near-zero volume (0.08% of MCap) — coin is effectively illiquid, exit is nearly impossible

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)

Finding: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk

Supply Structure

Tokenomics

7/20

35%

Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).

Finding: Over half the supply (~70%) is held off-market — a single coordinated seller can dictate the price

On-Chain Holder Concentration

Tokenomics

18/22

82%

Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Over 50% in the top 10 enables single-hand price control.

Finding: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 63.1% of supply — majority control by a handful of addresses, a textbook manipulation setup

Not contributing (2): Price Volatility, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$49.27M
24h Volume$38.80K
Vol / MCap0.1%
All-Time High$0.00001370
ATH Drop-94.03%
ATH Date2 years ago
Circulating Supply60.00T
Total Supply200.00T
Max Supply200.00T
7d Change
30d Change

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Ethereum · measured 2026-09-09

We checked GEKKO’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.

Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

Ten largest wallets

74.7%

including custodial

Largest private wallets

63.1%

after excluding 2

2 of GEKKO’s ten largest holders are labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn addresses — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating them out moves the top-10 figure by 11.6 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.

Wallets excluded from the top 10

AddressClassified asLabelShare
0x0000…deadBurn addressBurn Addresses · Burn Address: 0x00...dEaD11.66%
0xcffa…0703Exchange walletCrypto.com · Crypto.com: Hot Wallet0.40%

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 98 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

GEKKO holder-concentration history

4 daily measurements · +0 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of GEKKO’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 4 days since 25 Aug 2026. The highest reading was 63.1% on 25 Aug 2026; the most recent reading is 63.1% on 31 Aug 2026.

10050050% flag threshold2026-08-252026-08-31

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-08-252026-09-16
Recorded measurements (4)
Daily top-10 holder concentration readings for GEKKO
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
63.1%Yes
63.1%Yes
63.1%Yes
63.1%Yes

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track GEKKO and 1,200+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about GEKKO

Is GEKKO a scam?

We do not allege that GEKKO (GEKKO) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 63.1% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 63/100 on our automated scale, which we label high risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is GEKKO flagged as high risk?

GEKKO's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 63.1% of supply — majority control by a handful of addresses, a textbook manipulation setup; drawdown from all-time high — Down 94% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater; volume anomaly — Near-zero volume (0.08% of MCap) — coin is effectively illiquid, exit is nearly impossible.

Who controls GEKKO's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of GEKKO control 63.1% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level, a small number of wallets can move the price at will and sell their position at once.

Is GEKKO safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. GEKKO scores 63/100 (high risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks