Is Gold Park a scam?
MEDIUM RISK · 39/100Gold Park (GPT) has an automated risk score of 39/100 — medium risk. Gold Park shows very low trading activity and is 85% below its all-time high. Our measurements cover market data only — we do not assess development activity, and low volume alone does not establish that a project has been discontinued.
Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026
Gold Park
gptMEDIUM$0.004736
-0.04% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
MEDIUM RISK
Driven primarily by volume anomaly (15 of 20 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about Gold Park, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Volume Anomaly: Near-zero volume (0.04% of MCap) — coin is effectively illiquid, exit is nearly impossible.
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 85% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline.
- Supply Structure: Over half the supply (~58%) is held off-market — a single coordinated seller can dictate the price.
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
Very low trading activity relative to size. We measure market data only and do not assess development activity
A small number of insider/team wallets control most of the supply (very low free float). This allows single-hand price control — pinning the price high to drain leveraged short positions via funding, then dumping the entire position for a sudden 90%+ collapse
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
14/25
56%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
15/20
75%
Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
3/15
20%
Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)
Supply Structure
Tokenomics
7/20
35%
Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).
Not contributing (3): Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
BNB Chain · measured 2026-09-10
We checked Gold Park’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
None of Gold Park’s ten largest holders matched a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn address, so the 60.8% we report is simply the plain top-10 share. On many tokens a large share of supply sits in custodial or burn addresses and has to be separated out first; on this one it does not.
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 99 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
Gold Park holder-concentration history
1 daily measurement · +0 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Gold Park’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 1 day since 31 Aug 2026. The highest reading was 60.8% on 31 Aug 2026; the most recent reading is 60.8% on 31 Aug 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (1)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 60.8% | No |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track Gold Park and 1,200+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Gold Park
Is Gold Park a scam?
We do not allege that Gold Park (GPT) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 60.8% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 39/100 on our automated scale, which we label medium risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Gold Park flagged as medium risk?
Gold Park's risk score is driven mainly by: volume anomaly — Near-zero volume (0.04% of MCap) — coin is effectively illiquid, exit is nearly impossible; drawdown from all-time high — Down 85% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline; supply structure — Over half the supply (~58%) is held off-market — a single coordinated seller can dictate the price.
Who controls Gold Park's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Gold Park hold 60.8% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our 50% manipulation-flag threshold.
Is Gold Park safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Gold Park scores 39/100 (medium risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.