Is Pieverse a scam?
EXTREME RISK · 73/100Pieverse (PIEVERSE) has an automated risk score of 73/100 — extreme risk. Pieverse is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 85.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. 27.5% circulating (~73% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk. Down 59% from ATH — significant decline.
Automated assessment · updated 1 August 2026
Pieverse
pieverseEXTREME$0.6905
+9.00% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
EXTREME RISK
Pieverse is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 85.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. 27.5% circulating (~73% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk. Down 59% from ATH — significant decline.
Here is what the public data shows about Pieverse, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 85.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control.
- Supply Structure: 27.5% circulating (~73% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk.
- Price Collapse: Down 59% from ATH — significant decline.
- Price Volatility: 9.0% swing in 24h — moderate volatility.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
A small number of insider/team wallets control most of the supply (very low free float). This allows single-hand price control — pinning the price high to drain leveraged short positions via funding, then dumping the entire position for a sudden 90%+ collapse
Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. This is direct evidence that a handful of wallets can dictate the price and dump it at will
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Price Collapse
Price Action
8/25
32%
Severe ATH drawdown signals exit scams, abandoned projects, or post-pump dumps
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
1/20
5%
Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
0/15
0%
Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)
Supply Structure
Tokenomics
11/20
55%
Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).
Price Volatility
Price Action
2/15
13%
Extreme short-term price swings are a hallmark of coordinated pump-and-dump schemes
On-Chain Holder Concentration
Tokenomics
22/22
100%
Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Over 50% in the top 10 enables single-hand price control.
Transparency Gaps
Transparency
0/10
0%
Legitimate projects have verifiable public websites, whitepapers, and open-source code
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
Pieverse holder-concentration history
14 daily measurements · +0 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Pieverse’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 14 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 85.5% on 29 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 85.5% on 1 Aug 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (14)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Above 50% threshold |
|---|---|---|
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes | |
| 85.5% | Yes |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track Pieverse and 1,200+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Pieverse
Is Pieverse a scam?
Pieverse (PIEVERSE) carries an automated risk score of 73/100, rated extreme risk by FraudCoins.com. Pieverse is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 85.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. 27.5% circulating (~73% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk. Down 59% from ATH — significant decline. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Pieverse flagged as extreme risk?
Pieverse's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 85.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control; supply structure — 27.5% circulating (~73% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk; price collapse — Down 59% from ATH — significant decline.
Who controls Pieverse's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Pieverse control 85.5% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level, a small number of wallets can move the price at will and sell their position at once.
Is Pieverse safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Pieverse scores 73/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.