FraudCoins.com

Is UnifAI Network a scam?

EXTREME RISK · 76/100

UnifAI Network (UAI) has an automated risk score of 76/100 — extreme risk. UnifAI Network is controlled by a very small number of wallets: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 92.3% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control. With this little distribution, the price can be pinned and dumped at will — the defining trait of a market-manipulation token. 23.9% circulating (~76% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk. Down 56% from its all-time high — a significant decline.

Automated assessment · updated 31 August 2026

UnifAI Network

UnifAI Network

uaiEXTREME
Supply ConcentrationTop-10 Concentration

$0.3659

-13.50% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

76/100

Risk Score

EXTREME RISK

Driven primarily by on-chain holder concentration (22 of 22 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-08-31 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about UnifAI Network, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 92.3% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control.
  • Supply Structure: 23.9% circulating (~76% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk.
  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 56% from its all-time high — a significant decline.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Supply Concentration

A small number of insider/team wallets control most of the supply (very low free float). This allows single-hand price control — pinning the price high to drain leveraged short positions via funding, then dumping the entire position for a sudden 90%+ collapse

Top-10 Concentration

Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. This is direct evidence that a handful of wallets can dictate the price and dump it at will

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

8/25

32%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 56% from its all-time high — a significant decline

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

1/20

5%

Abnormal volume-to-market-cap ratio is the primary indicator of wash trading or liquidity traps

Finding: Volume at 13.0% of market cap — within normal range

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Small market caps can be trivially manipulated by a single large holder (whale)

Finding: Market cap under $100M — moderate manipulation risk

Supply Structure

Tokenomics

11/20

55%

Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means both future dilution from locked reserves and concentration enabling single-hand price control (estimated; verified holder data is scored separately).

Finding: 23.9% circulating (~76% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk

Price Volatility

Price Action

2/15

13%

Extreme short-term price swings are a hallmark of coordinated pump-and-dump schemes

Finding: 13.5% swing in 24h — moderate volatility

On-Chain Holder Concentration

Tokenomics

22/22

100%

Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Over 50% in the top 10 enables single-hand price control.

Finding: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 92.3% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control

Not contributing (1): Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$87.38M
24h Volume$11.39M
Vol / MCap13.0%
All-Time High$0.8365
ATH Drop-56.27%
ATH Date3 days ago
Circulating Supply239.00M
Total Supply1.00B
Max Supply1.00B
7d Change
30d Change

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our live risk badge — it updates automatically with each daily scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

BNB Chain · measured 2026-09-13

We checked UnifAI Network’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.

Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

None of UnifAI Network’s ten largest holders matched a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig or burn address, so the 92.3% we report is simply the plain top-10 share. On many tokens a large share of supply sits in custodial or burn addresses and has to be separated out first; on this one it does not.

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 95 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-08-31. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

UnifAI Network holder-concentration history

14 daily measurements · +0 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of UnifAI Network’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 14 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 92.4% on 26 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 92.3% on 31 Aug 2026.

10050050% flag threshold2026-07-182026-08-31

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-292026-09-16
Recorded measurements (14)
Daily top-10 holder concentration readings for UnifAI Network
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
92.3%Yes
92.3%Yes
92.3%Yes
92.3%Yes
92.2%Yes
92.1%Yes
92.2%Yes
92.1%Yes
92.2%Yes
92.3%Yes
92.2%Yes
92.3%Yes

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track UnifAI Network and 1,200+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about UnifAI Network

Is UnifAI Network a scam?

We do not allege that UnifAI Network (UAI) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 92.3% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 76/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is UnifAI Network flagged as extreme risk?

UnifAI Network's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 92.3% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — extreme concentration that allows single-hand price control; supply structure — 23.9% circulating (~76% off-market) — significant future unlocks and concentration risk; drawdown from all-time high — Down 56% from its all-time high — a significant decline.

Who controls UnifAI Network's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of UnifAI Network control 92.3% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level, a small number of wallets can move the price at will and sell their position at once.

Is UnifAI Network safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. UnifAI Network scores 76/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks